Tag characters

[Mark Davis ☕️]

The consortium is in no position to enhance protocols *itself* for
exchanging images. That's firmly in other groups' hands. We can try to
noodge them a bit, but what *will* make a difference is when the *vendors*
of sticker solutions put pressure on the different groups responsible for
the protocols to provide interoperability for images. Because there is a
lot of growth in sticker solutions, I would expect there to be more such
pressure. And even so, I expect it will take those some time to be deployed.

We've said what our longer-term position is, and I think we all pretty much
agree with that; exchanging images is much more flexible. However, we do
have strong short-term pressure to show that we are responsive and
responsible in adding emoji. And our adding a reasonable number of emoji
per year is not going to stop Line or Skype from adding stickers!

There are a few possible scenarios, and it's hard to predict the results.
It could be that emoji are largely supplanted by stickers in 5 years; could
be 10; could be that they both coexist indefinitely. I have no ��, and
neither does anyone else...


Mark <https://google.com/+MarkDavis>

*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft.com>
wrote:

>  And yet UTC devotes lots of effort (with an entire subcommittee) to
> encode more emoji as characters, but no effort toward any preferred longer
> term solution not based on characters.
>
>
>
>
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> *From:* Unicode [mailto:unicode-bounces at unicode.org] *On Behalf Of *Shervin
> Afshar
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 14, 2015 2:27 PM
> *To:* wjgo_10009 at btinternet.com
> *Cc:* unicode at unicode.org
> *Subject:* Re: Tag characters
>
>
>
> Thinking about this further, could the technique be used to solve the
> requirements of
> section 8 Longer Term Solutions
>
>
>
> IMO, the industry preferred longer term solution (which is also discussed
> in that section with few existing examples) for emoji, is not going to be
> based on characters.
>
>
>
>
>   ↪ Shervin
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:40 PM, William_J_G Overington <
> wjgo_10009 at btinternet.com> wrote:
>
> > What else would be possible if the same sort of technique were applied
> to another base character?
>
>
> Thinking about this further, could the technique be used to solve the
> requirements of
>
> section 8 Longer Term Solutions
>
> of
>
> http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr51/tr51-2.html
>
> ?
>
>
> Both colour pixel map and colour OpenType vector font solutions would be
> possible.
>
>
> Colour voxel map and colour vector 3d solids solutions are worth thinking
> about too as fun coding thought experiments that could possibly lead to
> useful practical results.
>
>
>
>
> William Overington
>
>
> 14 May 2015
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20150515/db7b724b/attachment.html>