Meroitic cursive fractions numerical values
public at khwilliamson.com
Sat Mar 28 15:37:25 CDT 2015
On 03/28/2015 02:25 PM, Asmus Freytag (t) wrote:
> Unless there is a value in documenting the value of the numerator and
> denominator, in which case this should be prominently explained in the
It seems to me that the character name provides sufficient documentation
of the numerator and denominator
Or is that written down somewhere already?
> On 3/28/2015 1:05 PM, Karl Williamson wrote:
>> In the 8.0 Beta files, some numerical values are not reduced to their
>> lowest forms. Is there a compelling reason that
>> 109FB;MEROITIC CURSIVE FRACTION SIX TWELFTHS;No;0;R;;;;6/12;N;;;;;
>> is not written as
>> 109FB;MEROITIC CURSIVE FRACTION SIX TWELFTHS;No;0;R;;;;1/2;N;;;;;
>> given that there is also a
>> 109BD;MEROITIC CURSIVE FRACTION ONE HALF;No;0;R;;;;1/2;N;;;;;
>> Aren't the numeric values of U+109FB and U+109BD the same?
>> Existing software that looks at the numeric values of characters is
>> written expecting that rational numbers will have been reduced to
>> their lowest form.
>> Unicode mailing list
>> Unicode at unicode.org
More information about the Unicode