Emoji (was: Re: Unicode block for programming related symbols and codepoints?)

[Shervin Afshar]

> Of course not. But that's been a stated condition for labeling something
> as "compatibility."

It *is* compatibility; go back and read my email where I mentioned exactly
where it was used.


↪ Shervin

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Doug Ewell <doug at ewellic.org> wrote:

> Mark Davis ☕️ <mark at macchiato dot com> wrote:
>
> >> In what character encoding standard, or extension, does ROBOT FACE
> >> appear?
> >
> > Unicode has never been limited to what is in other character encoding
> > standard or extensions, "official" or de facto.
>
> Of course not. But that's been a stated condition for labeling something
> as "compatibility."
>
> --
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, USA | http://ewellic.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20150210/be5de749/attachment.html>