fonts for U7.0 scripts

[Tom Gewecke]

On Oct 24, 2014, at 8:18 AM, Peter Constable wrote:

> From: Unicode [mailto:unicode-bounces at unicode.org] On Behalf Of Tom Gewecke
> 
>> If someone wants to publish and sell a book in which they say something like 
>> "This is how Unicode suggests that character U+XXXX is supposed to look:" 
> 
> Well, since the intent of the codes is to give indication of what the character identity is and _not_ to say how the character _should_ look, then it's a good thing if Unicode isn't authors to make such statements.

I probably didn't express myself clearly before.  Even if the book simply says  "The charts published by Uncode.org indicate that the following would be a representative glyph for the Character U+XXXX", it seems that you would need permission to copy the glyph.   I wonder if that is necessary.