"Heron" element in Unicode?
michel at suignard.com
Tue Mar 18 15:56:13 CDT 2014
>> It's a simplification of 雚, and similar to but not the same as 隺. If
>> not currently in Unicode, is it the sort of thing that might be
>> considered for addition in the future?
>People have been talking for many years about encoding the relatively few CJK components that do not exist as characters in there own right, and I think that there would be some support from the relevant committees if a well-presented proposal was submitted.
Isn't that component even used in 10646 Annex S.1.4.3 (9th pair)? It is one of my surprise that 10646 can't even be fully textually documented using 10646 character elements (we use many pictures in Annex S). It has been one of my goals to get all Annex S 'components' to be fully encoded, but I'd need time to create the glyphs, unless someone wants to volunteer.
More information about the Unicode