Corrigendum #9

[David Starner]

On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:02 AM, Richard Wordingham
<richard.wordingham at ntlworld.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 00:42:54 -0700
> David Starner <prosfilaes at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> No, the PUA is not. Then where are you getting the 99 PUA characters
>> you suggested using?
>
> By escaping them as well.  The point of the complex scheme is to keep
> searching simple.  Using a general escape character doesn't work so
> well.

The point is, instead of escaping the PUA so you can use the
noncharacters, why not just escape the PUA so you can use the PUA
characters? The latter is simpler and more flexible.

-- 
Kie ekzistas vivo, ekzistas espero.