Unclear text in the UBA (UAX#9) of Unicode 6.3
eliz at gnu.org
Tue Apr 22 11:08:56 CDT 2014
> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 20:32:15 -0700
> From: Ilya Zakharevich <nospam-abuse at ilyaz.org>
> Cc: verdy_p at wanadoo.fr, ken at unicode.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu.org>,
> unicode Unicode Discussion <unicode at unicode.org>, James Clark
> <jjc at jclark.com>
> Sorry, I do not see any definition here. Just a collection of words
> which looks like a definition, but only locally…
Any definition is just a collection of words, of course. Can you tell
what is missing from this collection to make it eligible?
> 1( 2[ 3( 4] 5) 6)
> Is looking-at-1 forcing match of 3-and-5? Or what?
More information about the Unicode