Unclear text in the UBA (UAX#9) of Unicode 6.3

Mark Davis ☕️ mark at macchiato.com
Tue Apr 22 01:57:41 CDT 2014

We try not to do that. There are some known holes, like RBNF. if you know
of others please file a ticket.

On Apr 21, 2014 9:18 PM, "Doug Ewell" <doug at ewellic.org> wrote:

> From: Asmus Freytag <asmusf at ix dot netcom dot com> wrote:
> > In general, I heartily dislike "specifications" that just narrate a
> > particular implementation...
> I agree completely. I see this with CLDR as well; there is a more or
> less implicit assumption that I will be using ICU to implement whatever
> is being described. I don't care how robust and well-tested a wheel is;
> as a developer, I should be able to use the specification to reinvent it
> if I like.
> --
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, USA
> http://ewellic.org | @DougEwell
> _______________________________________________
> Unicode mailing list
> Unicode at unicode.org
> http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20140422/ec818aff/attachment.html>

More information about the Unicode mailing list