Devanagari vowels - Alternative forms.

[Anish V via Indic]

Thank you for the clarification.
Is there any font supporting this variant format?

On Dec 13, 2017 00:15, "Anshuman Pandey" <pandey at umich.edu> wrote:

> Such variants generally do not appear concurrently as they are part of
> stylistic sets associated with scribal and, eventually, print traditions.
> Apart from अ, there are variants for letters such as झ, भ, etc, and
> conjuncts such as क्ष, ज्ञ, as well as digits, eg. ८, ९. These should be
> handled typographically. But, it is unfortunate that a user can’t
> specifically choose which alternate set they’d like.
>
> All my best,
> Anshuman
>
>
> On Dec 12, 2017, at 12:29 PM, Kiran Kumar Chava via Indic <
> indic at unicode.org> wrote:
>
> Isn't it simply different font?
> Why can not a different font handle this?
> Are both used simultaneously in a single sentence?
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Anish V via Indic <indic at unicode.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>    Is there any current proposal to encode alternate forms of Devanagari
>> vowels? I don't think they are archaic forms, we can see some in post
>> independence Indian coins also. The images of scripts and coins are
>> attached for reference.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Indic mailing list
>> Indic at unicode.org
>> http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/indic
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> ----
> ~Kiran Kumar Chava
> <http://geek.chavakiran.com>http://kinige.com
> http://suravara.com
> http://chavakiran.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Indic mailing list
> Indic at unicode.org
> http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/indic
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/indic/attachments/20171213/26c1a332/attachment.html>