CLDR survey / Polish keyboard

[Mark Davis ☕️ via CLDR-Users]

This one would be more useful if it were more complete, and the data were
managed better. But there are far less useful ISO standards!

Mark


On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 4:20 PM Janusz S. Bień <jsbien at mimuw.edu.pl> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 05 2018 at 14:56 +0200, Mark Davis ☕️ wrote:
> > The email isn't on a single topic, so I just skimmed. Some quick remarks:
> >
> >> I hope not all CLDR data are driven by Wikidata...
> > The Wikidata names are only used for subdivisions, and then only for
> > ones that are "new" (where there were no preexisting names). The names
> > are currently not visible via the Survey tool, and thus need
> > modification via tickets.  The reason not to show them in the ST is
> > that it would load the tool down further and burden the vetters
> > (tripling the number of fields).
> >
> >> using abbreviation like "plpm"
> >
> > That isn't an abbreviation, it is a code for a
> > subdivision. Corresponds to the ISO 3166-2 code PL-PM
>
> Thanks for explanation. I found the probably full list of codes for
> Poland here:
>
> https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-2:PL
>
> Still in doubt whether the codes are of any use, but we have to live
> with it. Some time ago, as a member of a technical committee of the
> Polish Committee for Standardization I tried to block an ISO standard of
> no practical use, and it appeared completely impossible...
>
> Best regards
>
> Janusz
>
> --
>              ,
> Janusz S. Bien
> emeryt (emeritus)
> https://sites.google.com/view/jsbien
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/cldr-users/attachments/20180905/64091161/attachment.html>