propose th-u-lb-nodict

[Richard Wordingham via CLDR-Users]

On Thu, 25 May 2017 14:39:58 -0700
Peter Edberg via CLDR-Users <cldr-users at unicode.org> wrote:

> > -u-ld-thai0-pali0 (using 0 to pad the subtags to 5 alphanum)
> > -u-ld-thai0-sanskrit

I'm not sure why there should be line-breaking 'dictionary' for Pali in
Thai script, 

> > Perhaps the -nodict should also be by script, e.g.
> > -u-ld-thai0-nodict
> > still allows dictionary use for CJK, just none for Thai script.

Most dictionaries should be identified by language, not script.  The
problem being addressed is the use of a Siamese dictionary for breaking
text in other languages. 

There is something practical that we haven't touched on.  Should we be
defining the language to be assumed for embedded foreign text?

Richard.