Inconsistent RBNF Data?

[Cameron Dutro]

Huh ok I didn't realize that "ciento" is correct. The question still
remains: why does ICU generate "cienta" instead?

-Cameron

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Steven R. Loomis <srl at icu-project.org>
wrote:

> It’s not a reversed patch, it just claims that it should be ciento for 101
>  and NOT cienta.
>
> -s
>
> El 11/8/16 12:56 PM, "CLDR-Users en nombre de Kent Karlsson" <
> cldr-users-bounces at unicode.org en nombre de kent.karlsson14 at telia.com>
> escribió:
>
>
> My question is if the corresponding patch should be applied for
> Portuguese, which currently use "cento" also for the feminine case.
>
> BUT NOTE THAT: The current version for Spanish has that patch reversed,
> according to *CLDR Ticket #6461 <http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/ticket/6461
> <http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/ticket/6461>>*.
>
> /Kent K
>
> Den 2016-11-08 20:27, skrev "Steven R. Loomis" <srl at icu-project.org>:
>
> It can be helpful give some ICU source code, and which version is being
> used.
>
> But probably relevant is http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/changeset/9025 –
> perhaps you are comparing an ICU older than this commit?
>
> -s
>
> El 11/8/16 10:43 AM, "CLDR-Users en nombre de Cameron Dutro" <
> cldr-users-bounces at unicode.org en nombre de cameron at lumoslabs.com>
> escribió:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> I'm running into a strange inconsistency between ICU's output and the data
> available in CLDR when formatting numbers using RBNF rules.
>
> One specific example is the spellout-cardinal-feminine rule set in
> Spanish. In CLDR v30 <http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/
> browser/tags/release-30-d05/common/rbnf/es.xml#L128>  and v29 <
> http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/browser/tags/release-29/
> common/rbnf/es.xml#L128> , the rule for 101 is "ciento" which is
> incorrect for the feminine case. ICU however formats feminine spellouts
> correctly by using "cienta."
>
> Where in the world is ICU getting its data? Why does it appear as if ICU
> isn't actually using the currently available CLDR data?
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> -Cameron
> _______________________________________________ CLDR-Users mailing list
> CLDR-Users at unicode.org http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/cldr-users
>
>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> CLDR-Users mailing list
> CLDR-Users at unicode.org
> http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/cldr-users
>
> _______________________________________________ CLDR-Users mailing list
> CLDR-Users at unicode.org http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/cldr-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/cldr-users/attachments/20161108/80aa1265/attachment.html>