Inconsistent RBNF Data?

[Cameron Dutro]

Ah right, I forgot to mention the version of ICU. I'm using v57.1 which I
thought was the version that corresponds to CLDR v29.

The source code is actually Ruby code (running on JRuby). You can see the
code in question here
<https://github.com/twitter/twitter-cldr-rb/blob/importers_refactor/lib/twitter_cldr/resources/rbnf_test_importer.rb>
.

Steven, it looks like that changeset was submitted 3 years ago, but isn't
reflected in v29 or v30 of CLDR (but appears to have made it into ICU
somehow).

Thanks for your help!

-Cameron

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Steven R. Loomis <srl at icu-project.org>
wrote:

> It can be helpful give some ICU source code, and which version is being
> used.
>
> But probably relevant is http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/changeset/9025 –
> perhaps you are comparing an ICU older than this commit?
>
> -s
>
> El 11/8/16 10:43 AM, "CLDR-Users en nombre de Cameron Dutro" <
> cldr-users-bounces at unicode.org en nombre de cameron at lumoslabs.com>
> escribió:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> I'm running into a strange inconsistency between ICU's output and the data
> available in CLDR when formatting numbers using RBNF rules.
>
> One specific example is the spellout-cardinal-feminine rule set in
> Spanish. In CLDR v30
> <http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/browser/tags/release-30-d05/common/rbnf/es.xml#L128>
> and v29
> <http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/browser/tags/release-29/common/rbnf/es.xml#L128>,
> the rule for 101 is "ciento" which is incorrect for the feminine case. ICU
> however formats feminine spellouts correctly by using "cienta."
>
> Where in the world is ICU getting its data? Why does it appear as if ICU
> isn't actually using the currently available CLDR data?
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> -Cameron
> _______________________________________________ CLDR-Users mailing list
> CLDR-Users at unicode.org http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/cldr-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/cldr-users/attachments/20161108/2e1d8eec/attachment.html>