Use of Unicode 6.3 bidi format chars in CLDR number formats?

Steven Loomis srl at icu-project.org
Thu Apr 28 23:37:22 CDT 2016


Asmus:

> Given the correct choice of internal format for the database,


The internal format is a Unicode String, specifically, UTF-8.  

> Given that CLDR data should be specifying the desired appearance

But CLDR is text, specifically, XML, and not glyphs…

Steven

El 4/28/16 7:30 PM, "CLDR-Users en nombre de Asmus Freytag (c)" <cldr-users-bounces at unicode.org en nombre de asmusf at ix.netcom.com> escribió:

>On 4/28/2016 3:44 PM, Peter Edberg wrote:
>> Dear CLDR users,
>
>Peter,
>
>I think this is where a "one size fits all" solution isn't the answer.
>
>Ideally, I'll be able to use CLDR (and formatting tools depending on it) 
>to format date/time/number strings for a variety of consumers.
>
>Plain text (pre 6.3), Plain text with isolates support, and plain text 
>for embedding into markup (where I'll supply external markup to isolate 
>and otherwise prep the field).
>
>Given that CLDR data should be specifying the desired appearance (not 
>the bidi controls necessary to get to that) it should be possible to 
>provide mechanical conversion between these formats, rather than having 
>to make a single choice for the data base.
>
>Not only will "pre 6.3" support be an issue for a long time to come, I 
>am confidently predicting that the need for multiple bidi flavors will 
>continue beyond the adoption of the isolates. Whether a string is part 
>of an (arbitrary) plain text stream or a separate data field (with its 
>scope determined by markup and with it's own bidi styling) will continue 
>to call for somewhat different data.
>
>Given the correct choice of internal format for the database, it should 
>be possible to provide all of these flavors mechanically, thus avoiding 
>the full cost of duplication, while freeing users from having to make 
>those format translations themselves.
>
>A./
>_______________________________________________
>CLDR-Users mailing list
>CLDR-Users at unicode.org
>http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/cldr-users




More information about the CLDR-Users mailing list