From markus.icu at gmail.com  Wed Oct  1 14:54:28 2014
From: markus.icu at gmail.com (Markus Scherer)
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 12:54:28 -0700
Subject: Unicode locale ID vs. POSIX variant
In-Reply-To: <CAJ2xs_H0b4j1NPp7nM=kb3A5EquZN_tv9YMJuO2urEgauc=tdQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN49p6ptyHNLrT2_p_LXJnCWtmjY3LrCbrAZbLCNHh=vkZSyog@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ2xs_H0b4j1NPp7nM=kb3A5EquZN_tv9YMJuO2urEgauc=tdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAN49p6pgtJseZdzy=AfeQdxV+f6iVgpGcvwM==bUYC_Mfw8SaA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Mark Davis ?? <mark at macchiato.com> wrote:

> I agree that this is not nearly as clean as we'd like. You should probably
> file a ticket, and mention the text that led you astray, or where you see a
> good point in the text where we can clarify this better.
>

http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/ticket/7958 "emphasize that the POSIX variant
should be converted to -u-va-posix (and back?)"

Fredrik R., do you have more questions/issues to add to the ticket?

markus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/cldr-users/attachments/20141001/3e2e1f7b/attachment-0001.html>